Cheers
Ian
yayBluesuit wrote:I just read that the Chancellor of the Exchequer, has reinstated the rolling tax exemption for classic cars in today's budget. It will apply to cars over 40 years old, meaning any car made before 1974, will be tax exempt and this will roll forward each year. So happy Sud owners, provided the next Government doesn't change the policy, you will begin to enjoy tax exempt status over the next 10 years!![]()
Cheers
Ian
hopefully until my '76 sud ti qualifies at leastSpacenut wrote:Yes, I remember the first time round - year one, about 80,000 cars went tax-free. No biggie, there's still 23 million paying through the nose. Year two - another 180,000 go tax-free. Hmm, this could start to make a difference. Year three, a quarter of a million tax-free drivers, this has got to stop!
So they made the definition of a "classic" anything manufactured (or first registered) prior to January 1973, leaving owners of Ferrari 375GTB/4s and the Austin Allegro owners club crying into their vodka-martinis.
Welcome back rolling tax exemption! I wonder how long it will last this time?
Lauren
Nige005 wrote:Just read elsewhere that the applicable date is the date of manufacture and not the date of registration so you'll have to do a bit of research before you can claim even this paltry concession.
Seems to me that life in general is made more difficult than it needs to be or maybe it's just me that gets frustrated with jumping through hoops to do the most simple of things.
Nige005 wrote:Just read elsewhere that the applicable date is the date of manufacture and not the date of registration so you'll have to do a bit of research before you can claim even this paltry concession.
Seems to me that life in general is made more difficult than it needs to be or maybe it's just me that gets frustrated with jumping through hoops to do the most simple of things.
the 25 years old system was great, at 40 years it'll be a while till my GTV gets there.petrolhead wrote:Flippin joke though,
What was wrong with the old rolling system?
Oh yeah, that was it, greed!
I think either date will work - if you go by date of first registration, you won't get any complaints from the government as you will effectively be paying tax for longer, as you can't register a car before you've built it!Nige005 wrote:Just read elsewhere that the applicable date is the date of manufacture and not the date of registration so you'll have to do a bit of research before you can claim even this paltry concession.
Haha, if it makes you feel any better, "the fish" was REALLY rusty. 1971 E-body, export version. Only a 5.2 litre V8 and "slap-stik" auto, but it turned out to be the Belgian motor show display car and had every performance handling tweak in the Mopar arsenal - Hemi torsion bars, vented disc brakes, heavy duty rear springs, limited slip diff, pinion snubber(!)... for a hefty old bruiser, it had some poise!petrolhead wrote:Plymouth Barracuda!
O M G![]()
I always have, and always will, love muscle car and mopar, even though i'm fanatical about quite the opposite![]()
very jealous!